The article....
Irvine tech firm branching out into broadband
Success in DSL could erase investors' memories of IJNT's troubled roots.
May 7, 2000
By CHRIS KNAP The Orange County Register From Los Angeles
The radio advertisements call it "broadband." Techies call it "fat pipe."
It's an Internet connection so speedy a user can download the entire Wall Street Journal in 62 seconds -- while simultaneously chatting on the phone.
Delivered to homes and offices over existing copper phone lines, these "digital subscriber lines" are another small revolution in modern communications.
IJNT.net Inc. of Irvine, Orange County's newest member of the Nasdaq stock exchange, is touting itself as a new player in the $100 billion-dollar broadband market.
Run by a husband and wife team previously sanctioned in three states for allegedly selling illegal investments, the company says it will roll out a Los Angeles-based digital subscriber line service within the next few months.
IJNT (soon to be called Universal Broadband Networks) hopes to expand throughout California, then head east across the U.S.
It's a speculative venture. Like many new technology companies, IJNT.net has never made a profit - in fact, it lost $10 million over the past three quarters.
The fine print on its Securities and Exchange Commission disclosures says IJNT may not be able to survive against bigger, better-known and better-connected telecommunications companies already offering digital subscriber lines, such as PacBell, Covad and NorthPoint.
That kind of warning to investors is relatively common.
Perhaps more troubling are IJNT's roots in a series of "wireless cable" TV companies that regulators in three states labeled illegal investment schemes. In 1993 and 1994 Jon H. Marple and Mary E. Blake, who today are the chief executive, president and majority stockholders in IJNT, were accused by California, Wisconsin and Maine of using false statements to sell unregistered investments in wireless cable TV partnerships in Louisiana, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and Iowa.
At that time, state and federal regulators were cracking down on telephone "boiler rooms" that sold investments in wireless cable.
The name is actually a misnomer: These systems use microwaves, instead of cable, to beam multiple channels to a user's rooftop antenna.
But wireless cable faced a lot of challenges, and many systems were never built.
Regulators said elderly and unsophisticated investors lost $30 million in such schemes,
In April 1994, investigators for the California Department of Corporations raided Micro- Lite Television of Newport Beach, run by Marple and Blake.
At the time, Marple insisted his operation was legitimate and predicted he would be exonerated. He wasn't.
In December 1994, the state Department of Corporations filed a 15-page complaint in Orange County Superior Court accusing Marple and Blake of securities fraud.
According to the complaint, Marple's salesmen lied about the risk involved and the amount of capital Marple had lined up from established bankers. Salesmen allegedly never told investors that Micro-Lite hadn't yet built a single wireless system.
Then Marple sold all license rights to the Louisiana and Massachusetts systems and shifted investors to the Iowa system without their knowledge or permission, the documents allege.
Marple and Blake settled the case two weeks later by signing a consent decree with the state. They admitted no wrongdoing but agreed to buy back partnerships from people now invested in the Iowa partnership. The state barred Marple and Blake from lying to investors or selling unregistered securities.
Marple and Blake also signed similar consent decrees in Wisconsin and Maine.
In a telephone interview from his $1.9 million home in Palm Desert, Marple, a former attorney for the Federal Communications Commission, said he didn't know the people selling the investments in his partnerships.
"We transferred some licenses to some people in San Diego, who turned out to be bad people," Marple said. "The Department of Corporations tied us into that. The fact is we'd never met those people. We just sold them licenses that they resold."
Marple also asserted that IJNT has no connection to the wireless cable companies.
Public documents contradict Marple's statements.
The Superior Court complaint alleges that Marrco Communications Inc. and MCC Venture Group were the companies selling the unregistered investments. Marple was the president of Marrco, and Blake was the CEO. MCC was a wholly owned subsidiary of Marrco and was run by Blake.
And IJNT's SEC disclosures show the company acquired the assets of Micro-Lite Television of Beaumont in 1999.
As for Micro-Lite Television Corp., its name was changed to Superior Wireless in 1996, then to JustWebIt.com last year. Shares trade over the counter for $2.
"There may have been some individuals that didn't make money," Marple said. "But generally speaking they did fine."
WIRELESS BROADBAND
The past won't matter to Wall Street investors if IJNT is successful with its current DSL venture.
As recently as a year ago, IJNT was concentrating on wireless high-speed Internet connections, based on new microwave technology.
Company financial disclosures show that the bulk of the company's revenue over the past two years came from these wireless Internet connections, as well as from dial-up Internet access services.
In the past year the company has changed its focus, zeroing in on digital subscriber line technology. Such systems can transmit 25 times as much data per second as the fastest conventional telephone modems.
"We have always been a broadband company," said Marple. "Now we'll also be a state-of-the-art phone company delivering voice and data."
The potential of broadband communications has Wall Street investors salivating.
Covad Communications Group, a digital subscriber line service with 1999 revenue of $76 million, already has a market value of $4.4 billion. NorthPoint Communications, a DSL firm with 1999 revenue of $23 million, has a market value of $1.9 billion.
Tiny IJNT, just now building its DSL network, had quarterly sales of less than $1 million and a market value under $60 million when a few Wall Street bankers got interested.
Kaufman Bros., a Wall Street investment house that specializes in emerging communications companies, said in a Nov. 17 report that IJNT should be trading at $10 a share instead of its then $3.
IJNT hit $12 a month later and climbed to $20 in March. It closed Friday at $7.75, down 12 cents, which put its total market value at $155 million.
"Typically with these companies on the bulletin board, 90 percent of them aren't real," said Vik Grover, a communications analyst for Kaufman. "This is a real company with several million in revenues and Nortel as a sponsor.''
(Nortel has advanced IJNT about $44 million in credit for purchases of its switching equipment.)
Grover conceded that the company is unproven, its network yet to be rolled out. He also disclosed that Kaufman hopes to work for IJNT as an investment banker.
"It's a little premature to be recommending them to our clients. That's why we don't have a rating on the stock," Grover said. "But there's something there to keep your eye on."
PITCHING NASA
IJNT has also converted other doubters.
The company sent Louis DiGregorio, its vice president of network architecture, to Moffet Field in Northern California to pitch NASA on its high- speed Internet access. DiGregorio, an engineer who helped build Orange County government's phone system, brought notebooks full of system maps showing his fiber-optic lines, Cisco routers and Nortel switches. Now IJNT has a contract to provide that NASA office with dial-up Internet access, and will soon add DSL.
In a visit last week to a warren of switching cages at Wilshire Boulevard and Seventh Street in downtown Los Angeles, DiGregorio showed off the company's data transport center, its network control center and the site of the switches that will connect it to PacBell's 213, 323 and 310 area codes.
When the final switches are installed and PacBell issues UBNetworks its area code and prefixes, the company will be in the broadband phone business.
"The Street is always waiting and hoping for more and more provable assurance," said Jerry Pulley, the company's vice president of marketing.
"We wouldn't have gotten the stock listing and the following we have if somebody didn't believe we had something pretty good."
grüße derm dude
|