GREENSHIFT aktie hat den boden erreicht!

habe mich gestern abend noch mit greenshift eingedeckt,

GS ist ein umwelttietel vom feinsten, 

keine kurzfristige anlage

lg a.

PS.: keine Kaufempfehlung  möchte mal wissen was ihr so denkt

 

Wie sieht bei GS CleanTech real in Zahlen aus?  

um die es da geht sowieso zu einem Großteil gehören. Soweit ich das einschätzen kann wird lediglich die Holding (=Greenshift) aufgelöst und die Werte einzeln an die Aktionäre der Holding verteilt, weil der Wert der Einzelwerte eben 75% über dem Wert der Holding liegt - warum auch immer. (Hat wohl mit Cornell zu tun, die ständig den Preis von GSHFT durch gezielte Transaktionen gedrückt haben).  

GSCT Aktionäre bekommen GSHF Aktien, die dann wieder in GSCT, GSEN, GSEG getauscht werden? Oder bleiben GSHF Aktien doch bestehen? Sehr verwirrend das Ganze.  

wenn alles vollzogen ist-moin-

gruß biker  

Klemme:
"As it happens, we no longer have a choice in the matter. The financing and operational needs of our growing business dictate that we take immediate action to complete the critical aspects of our consolidation."

Bisher litten sie unter eine unübersichtlichen Konzernstruktur, und jetzt ändern sie die -- und zwar so dass wieder keiner blickt was sie da machen :-)  

.... allerdings sind die Einzelheiten etwas unklar. Denke der Hauptgrund ist wirklich die Tatsache, dass die Einzelfirmen mehr Wert haben als die Holding in dem fall Greenshift, Greenshift ist also stark unterbewertet gewesen.  

usa dick im plus, was meint ihr wie weit wird es hier in deutschland gehen?
soll ich noch nachkaufen?????  

oder 0,03 ? um den realen Wert des Tauschportfolios wiederzuspiegeln. GSCT ist halt ein bisschen schwächer heute, weil viele in Greenshift umschichten, sollte sich aber bald geben  

und auch andere an der Frankfurter Börse nicht handeln - dürfte ein technisches Problem sein, also wer kann der sollte kaufen.  

Ich behalte das Glump!
Und wenn´s 0,0001 Euro wert ist.
HOLD



--  a bissla was geht immer  --  

also kaufen??? auf wieviel wird es steigen was meint ihr so, haben wir hier dem nächst einen aktie tausch? oder wie habe ich das ganze verstanden??  

wird erst interessant bei 6 Eurocent...  

erste verunsicherung vor allem der GSHF`ler
so bald die wissen ,was sie haben -oder auch nicht gehts noch diese woche hoch-denke ich...(vielleicht sogar sehr hoch)
mein kz freitag steht bei 0,011!


gruß biker  

 

Ich finde eine Null reicht. Vor einem Jahr standen die noch bei 0,1?. Nach meiner Meinung müssen die erst mal wieder dahin.  

sorry-war nicht rauszulesen...-da sind 0,011 doch ok-oder?

gruß biker  

ist ganz gut für den Anfang. Das man jetzt plötzlich hunderttausende oder sogar millionen von Aktien zugeteilt bekommt macht viele bestimmt misstrauisch. Nach meiner Meinung war das längst überfällig, denn Greenshift war auf Grund seiner Beteiligungen schon immer unterbewertet und die Produkte haben auch noch Zukunftschancen.  

 

waren ja nur lachhafte 6000 Stück... Meiner Meinung nach kann man eigentlich nur abwarten die 6-12 Wochen... dann sieht man mehr. Denke aber das einige positiv überrascht sein werden... nach all den negativ posts in manch anderen Foren...  

 

GreenShift Agrifuels and Global Ethanol Form Corn Oil Biodiesel Joint Venture
Wednesday November 14, 2:42 pm ET  
Companies to Build 30 Million Gallon Per Year Corn Oil Biodiesel Facility at Global Ethanol's 100 Million Gallon Ethanol Facility in Lakota, Iowa


NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--GreenShift Agrifuels (OTCBB: GSGF - News) and Global Ethanol, LLC today announced the execution of agreements to extract about 10 million gallons per year of crude corn oil from the distillers grain co-product of Global Ethanol?s 100 million gallon per year ethanol facility in Lakota, Iowa and 57 million gallon per year ethanol facility in Riga, Michigan, and to convert the extracted corn oil into biodiesel at Global Ethanol?s Lakota facility.  

 

aber ich denke es geht aufwärts, besonders wenn man nur das letzte Quartal betrachtet, das Glas ist halbvoll.

Aus dem Quarterly Report von gestern (nachbörslich):

http://biz.yahoo.com/e/071114/gshf.ob10qsb.html

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 VERSUS THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 2006

Revenues

Total revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2007 were $14,518,709, representing an increase of $8,566,699, or 144%, over the three months ended September 30, 2006 revenues of $5,952,010.

Cost of Revenues

Cost of revenues for the three months ended SFeptember 30, 2007 were $8,886,055, or 61.2% of revenue compared to $4,311,149, or 72.4% of revenue for the same period in 2006.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2007 were $2,879,085, or 19.83% of revenue compared to $2,652,446, or 44.6% of revenue for the same period in 2006. Included in the three months ended September 30, 2007 was $42,122 in stock based compensation as compared to $601,576 for the three months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in operating expenses is due primarily to increases in personnel and other overhead related to the Company's process engineering, feedstock production, oilseed crush and equipment manufacturing subsidiaries.

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was $1,514,459, representing an increase of $1,428,447 from $86,012 for the same period in 2006.

Expenses Associated with Derivative Instruments

Gain from the change in the fair market value of derivative liabilities was $2,660,160 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared with $7,996,848 for the three months ended September 30, 2007. Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discounts was $1,163,517and $7,159,068, respectively.

Net Income or Loss

Net income from continuing operations for the three months ended September 30, 2007, was $1,046,968 as compared to a loss from continuing operations of $967,413 from the same period in 2006. The Company sold its interest in Seaway Valley Capital Corporation during the three months ended September 30, 2007 resulting in a gain on disposal of discontinued operations of $9,765,281. This resulted in a net gain from discontinued operations of $9,762,212 for three months ended September 30, 2007 and loss of $30,708 for the same period in 2006 were excluded from the above figures. Net income of $10,719,674 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was due primarily to increased revenues from new business initiatives, a reduction in amortization charges associated with financing and issuance of stock based compensation as well as a reduction in selling, general and administrative expenses.



NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 VERSUS THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
2006

Revenues

Total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 were $25,121,218, representing an increase of $7,860,569, or 45.5%, over the nine months ended September 30, 2006 revenues of $17,260,649. Gain from discontinued operations of $2,814,954 and a loss of $41,072 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively, were excluded from these figures.


Cost of Revenues

Cost of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 were  $17,278,888,
or 68.8% of revenue  compared to  $12,297,390,  or 71.2% of revenue for the same
period in 2006.




Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 were $15,982,908 or 63.62% of revenue compared to $10,154,939, or 58.8% of revenue for the same period in 2006. Included in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $6,092,516 in stock based compensation as compared to $3,186,275 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in operating expenses is due primarily to increases in personnel and other overhead related to the Company's process engineering, feedstock production, oilseed crush and equipment manufacturing subsidiaires.

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $4,909,953, representing an increase of $3,648,662 from $1,261,291 for the same period in 2006.

Expenses Associated with Derivative Instruments

Gain from the change in the fair market value of derivative liabilities was $4,074,780 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared with $5,036,655 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discounts was $4,752,248 and $7,209,779, respectively.

Net Income or Loss

Net loss from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, was $15,078,902 as compared to a loss from continuing operations of $9,467,308 from the same period in 2006. The Company sold its interest in Seaway Valley Capital Corporation during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 resulting in a gain on disposal of discontinued operations of $9,765,281 and a loss from discontinued operations of $9,455,273. This resulted in a net gain from discontinued operations of $2,814,954 for nine months ended September 30, 2007 and loss of $41,072 for the same period in 2006 which were excluded from the above figures. Net loss of $12,734,543 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $9,114,839 for the same period in 2006 was due primarily to increased operating expenses for new business initiatives, adjustments to the fair market value of the derivative liability instruments, interest and amortization charges associated with financing, and issuance of stock based compensation.

Despite the 45.5% increase in revenues, net loss from continuing operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $12,734,543, an increase from the $9,659,535 loss recorded in the same period of 2006. The two primary reasons for the magnitude of the nine month loss were expenses attributable to the transition from technology development to mature market execution and expenses attributable to past financing activities.
 

da geht doch noch was!






--  a bissla was geht immer  --  

By JOE McDONALD
Associated Press Writer

AP Photo/Andy Wong



Latest News
US, China Working on Biofuels Pact
What About Oil Price? Voter Asks Clinton
Multimedia
          §Coal Use Produces Pollution, Illness
          §Coal Means Profit, Woes for China
          §Communist Party Holds Congress
          §Typhoon Wipha Strikes China
          §China Extending Its Reach Around the World
          §In China, the Desert Closes In
Latest News
China Sees Reduction in Coal Emissions
Minor Parties Advise China's Communists
China Returns Taiwan Mail Over UN Slogan
China Dissident Gets 5 Years in Prison
11 Die in China Massage Parlor Fire
Buy AP Photo Reprints

BEIJING (AP) -- The United States and China are working on a pact to promote use of ethanol and other biofuels to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and could announce an agreement as early as next month, an American official said Friday.
The agreement would call for cooperation in research, producing crops for fuel and other areas, said Alexander Karsner, an assistant U.S. energy secretary. He was in Beijing for talks with Chinese officials on promoting use of renewable energy sources.
The United States and China are the world's biggest oil consumers and producers of carbon dioxide and other gases that scientists say trap the sun's heat and are raising global temperatures.
Karsner said he and Chinese officials talked about a meeting next month in Indonesia of environment officials from 80 countries to discuss a replacement for the Kyoto Protocol on emissions reductions. He said he did not bring up Washington's insistence that Beijing, a major emissions source, accept binding limits. China has rejected emissions caps but says it will try to curb gas production.
A biofuels agreement could be announced at the Dec. 12 meeting of the Strategic Economic Dialogue, a high-level U.S.-Chinese forum on trade and other issues, Karsner said. He declined to give details, saying they still are being discussed.
It would be Washington's first such pact in Asia, following similar agreements with Brazil and Sweden, Karsner told reporters.
"China is a natural, as would be India, to enhance cooperation on biofuels," he said.
China has promoted wind power and other alternative energy in hopes of reducing environmental damage from heavy use of coal and oil to fuel its booming economy. The communist government also wants to curb reliance on imported energy, which it sees as a strategic weakness.
China already is the third-largest producer of biofuels after the United States and Brazil, which account for 80 percent of global production, according to Karsner.


© 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Learn more about our Privacy Policy.

Quelle: http://news.wired.com/dynamic/stories/C/...&CTIME=2007-11-16-07-28-14
--------------------------------------------------
Wer nicht investiert, solange ein Risiko zu sehen ist, ist nie investiert.
(Lothar Weniger, DG Bank AG)